Against Abridgment
Abstract
Primary sources can be messy pedagogical tools, intermingling anecdote with fact, extraneous detail with germane content. Students accustomed to gleaning information from textbooks—which present organized histories—may struggle with sources written for purposes other than the straightforward presentation of knowledge. Historic sources sometimes conceal their relevance with archaic phrases, off-topic asides, and misleading, biased, or inaccurate statements and that is why they are often abridged in modern editions. Through cropping and ellipsing, a messy primary source can be pared down to its most relevant information. But abridging is an essential skill for the study of music history. Presenting snippets from primary sources not only absolves students of the difficult but important task of abridging texts themselves, but also prevents them from indulging in the mundane details of historical life that can make the past seem less distant. Assigning readings from digitized historical texts can help achieve these goals.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).